Services for class action representatives.

“… A decision of this strategic importance is precisely the sort of area in respect of which the input of an experienced advisory committee might have been helpful and it would have been preferable if its input had been sought.” (Rowntree v PRS [2025] CAT 49 at 116).

While it is not (yet) mandatory for proposed class representatives to have access to an independent advisory committee, the CAT has made clear that the ability to consult with such a committee can strengthen the application for a CPO. In Rowntree v PRS, the Tribunal even suggested that for major strategic decisions—such as changing solicitors—input from an advisory committee would be preferable.

Advisory committees typically include former judges, economists, and academics. Eralis Partners can augment a committee’s unique expertise by ensuring the class representative and their legal team is equipped with the commercial nous to negotiate pricing, fee structures and mechanisms for dealing with budget overruns. Through Eralis Partners, I bring deep market intelligence on both the litigation funding sector and the claimant lawyers’ market. By working with Eralis Partners, representatives get the best out of their relationships with both funders and law firms.

Whether you are seeking collective redress in the CAT (pre- or post-CPO), bringing a representative action under CPR rule 19.8 following Lloyd v Google or constitute the steering committee of a group action, Eralis Partners can help. With experience in both private practice litigation and litigation funding, Eralis Partners provides the commercial edge your team needs: the right funding package for the class or group you represent and the best choice of legal representation.

I no longer practise as a solicitor (or advocate) and I do not provide legal advice. This ensures there is no conflict between Eralis Partners’ role and your legal team’s role.